Do it is thought by you is better for students to your workplace before their university study?

Do it is thought by you is better for students to your workplace before their university study?

MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, easier to write, easier to read.

PARAGRAPH 1
working experience, contacts, on the job skills. EG: Studies from the UK Government show graduates with work experience are twice as likely to find employment…..

PARAGRAPH 2
Better preparation, opportunity to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and private sector, helps student decide on future before committing long term, EG 1/6 students will change their higher education course while at uni….

Many people think that it is safer to learn something in a group in the place of individually. Can you agree or disagree?

Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has several advantages
Elements of teamwork could be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise

Paragraph 2
Disagree – Individualism is better
Self reliant, own the result, not determined by others
More mature way, more responsible
No laggards

Topic and Answer: Education (child)

Some people genuinely believe that children have to do organised activities within their time that is free while believe that children must certanly be able to do what they need to do in their spare time. Which viewpoint would you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to aid your answer.

PARAGRAPH 1 -In favour of letting them choose.
-benefits letting your head wonder, children can go to town, find themselves, do whatever they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent studies also show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it will be unfair to the minority.

PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan‘equipment that is-possible to shop for
-furthermore studies also show that mental performance operates better after a distraction from an organized task such as studying.

Topic and Answer: Globalisation

Many individuals say that globalisation additionally the growing quantity of multinational companies have a effect that is negative the environment. Which viewpoint would you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to guide your answer. To what extent would you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your role.

PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING ENVIRONMENTAL SURROUNDINGS
-Increased interaction between countries
-Increase in goods and services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop of the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these can have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the ecosystem that is local…

Scientists think that so that you can protect the surroundings, people must use less energy inside their daily lives. However, a lot of people have not changed the real way they live. Why do you would imagine many people never have taken individual action? What could possibly be done to cause them to become take action?

Ideas for body paragraph 1

Not taken individual action because:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy regarding the commons
– Collective problem – better to shirk responsibility

Ideas for body paragraph 2

What could be done to cause them to become take action?
– Media campaigns by the government
– Tax or incentives that are financial In Tokyo ……

Some genuinely essaywriter believe that could be the responsibility of men and women to take care of the environmental surroundings. Others say this is the government that will be careful of the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Paragraph 1
People should take care of the environment because:
We are the consumers, we vote with our wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)

Paragraph 2
Government should care for the environmental surroundings because:
They usually have the capacity to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
said to be guardians associated with the country, which means collectively they are guardians regarding the earth… although not true in fact

Conclusion
Both should always be doing more!

In several countries small shops and town centers are going out of business, because individuals tend to drive towards the large out-of-town stores. This leads to an increase in car use, plus it implies that people without cars have limited usage of out-of-town stores. You think features of such development outweigh its disadvantages?